Amy L Orsborn

Amy L Orsborn, B.Sc.

(Ph.D. in progress)
  • Position:
    Graduate student

    Joint Graduate Group in Bioengineering

    UC Berkeley & UCSF Graduate Program Bioengineering (San Francisco, CA)

  •  
  • Advisor:

    Jose Carmena

  •  
  • Degrees:
     
    Ph.D. (in progress), Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley (Berkeley, CA), University of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA)
     
    B.Sc., Engineering Physics, Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, OH)
  •  
  • Past Advisors:
     
    Robert F. Kirsch (as Undergraduate Student)
     
    James Collins (as Visiting Student)
  •  
  • Research:
    Exploring the role of stiffness control in movement accuracy and stability, and the related neural correlates in M1 and PMd, with the ultimate goal of incorporating dynamics control into brain-machine interfaces.

    The central nervous system (CNS) produces dexterous, skilled movements despite inherent unpredictability in the motor system and external environment. Recent studies show that limb impedance (inertia, damping, and stiffness) may be one mechanism used to overcome these challenges. Limb stiffness, in particular, shows task-specific modulation in a variety of tasks, and even appears to be optimized to task requirements (e.g. Burdet et al 2001, Wong et al 2009).These exciting findings suggest that limb stiffness is manipulated by the CNS. How does the CNS achieve task-relevant control of limb stiffness? Previous work reveals that co-contraction of antagonist muscle pairs, tuning of spinal reflex loop gains, and posture selection are key mechanisms for stiffness modulation. But how these different schemes are controlled and combined to create task-level control is still unclear. Related questions about how limb stiffness control is learned and represented by the CNS also remain open. Cortical areas, such as primary motor cortex (M1) and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) likely contribute, but activity in these areas has not been studied in the context of limb stiffness. M1 shows correlations with both movement dynamics and muscle activity, as well as abstract movement parameters. This makes the motor cortex a probable candidate for impedance representations, and also begs the question of what form such representations might take. Cortical involvement, moreover, raises the exciting possibility of incorporating stiffness control into neuroprostheses. Current brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have focused on decoding kinematic movement parameters, which alone are insufficient for dexterous control and interaction with external environments. Given limb stiffness’ strong role in controlling movement accuracy and stability, BMIs that incorporate modulation of upper-limb stiffness would provide more reliable performance in real world scenarios.

  •  
  • Other Experience:

    2008 Mathematics in Brain Imaging Summer Course, UCLA Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics

    2008 Neuroinformatics Summer Course, Marine Biological Laboratory

  •  
  • Honors:

    2008-present NSF Graduate Research Fellow

Life Sciences
Communities:

Amy Orsborn's Genealogy

The Adobe Flash Player plugin (version 8) is required to view the genealogy tree.
Download the plugin here.


Amy Orsborn's Posters and Presentations (2)

  • Neural correlates of limb stiffness modulation in an accuracy constraint task (poster)

    Amy L Orsborn and Jose M. Carmena

    Society for Neuroscience, Annual meeting, Chicago, IL; 10/2009
  • Stiffness control of 2-DOF exoskeleton for brain-machine interfaces (presentation)

    Rodolphe Héliot, Amy L Orsborn, and Jose M Carmena

    IEEE RAS / EMBS Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2nd International Conference, Scottsdale AZ; 10/2008


Join Epernicus (membership is free)
Epernicus is open to current and former research scientists.
First name:
Last name:
Email:

(we don't share your email)

Already a member?
Sign in to view Amy's full profile.